Journal of Scientific Dentistry

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  10 (2020)
Volume  9 (2019)
Volume  8 (2018)
Volume  7 (2017)
Volume  6 (2016)
Volume  5 (2015)
Volume  4 (2014)
Volume  3 (2013)
Volume  2 (2012)
Volume  1 (2011)
Related articles

VOLUME 10 , ISSUE 2 ( July-December, 2020 ) > List of Articles

CASE REPORT

Management of Class II Division I Malocclusion with Carriere Motion Appliance: A Case Report

Pavithranand Ammayappan, Arulmani Periasamy

Keywords : Carriere Motion Appliance, Class II malocclusion, Patient cooperation

Citation Information : Ammayappan P, Periasamy A. Management of Class II Division I Malocclusion with Carriere Motion Appliance: A Case Report. 2020; 10 (2):43-45.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10083-0930

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 04-02-2021

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Most of the patients reporting for the correction of proclined teeth have an underlying skeletal Class II base relation; management of these cases during the growth phase early in the treatment when patient compliance is at their best is advantageous. Although various functional appliances are available for use, the Carriere Motion Appliance (CMA) is simple, not bulky, and easy for the patient to adapt, as there is no bulky acrylic that would hinder the speech or during eating. This case report presents a 14-year-old patient treated with the CMA.

PDF Share
  1. Common chief complaints of patients seeking treatment in the government dental institution of Puducherry, India. J Indian Acad Dent Spec Res 2015;2(2):55–58.
  2. A new class II distalizer. J Clin Orthod 2004;38(4):224–231.
  3. Two-phase treatment of class II malocclusion in young growing patient. Contemp Clin Dent 2011;2(4):378–380.
  4. Contemporary Orthodontics. 4th ed., Mosby Elsevier; 2007. pp. 510–534.
  5. Treatment effects of the carriere motion 3D appliance for the correction of class II malocclusion in adolescents. And Orthod 2019;89(6):839–846. DOI: 10.2319/121418-872.1.
  6. Evaluating the treatment effectiveness and efficiency of carriere distalizer: a cephalometric and study model comparison of class II appliances. Prog Orthod. 2019;20(1):24. DOI: 10.1186/s40510-019-0280-2.
  7. Current concepts on functional appliances and mandibular growth stimulation. Aust Dent J 2000;45(3):173–178. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2000.tb00553.x.
  8. Treatment effects of fixed functional appliances in patients with class II malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod 2016;38(2):113–126. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjv034.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.