Journal of Scientific Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 9 , ISSUE 2 ( July-December, 2019 ) > List of Articles

CASE REPORT

Splinting of Implants and Adjacent Natural Teeth for Esthetic Correction in Anterior Maxilla: A Case Report

Ananya S Venkatesan, Vinoth Kumar, Karthikeyan Ilangovan, Vineela K Reddy, Saravana K Ravindran

Keywords : Implant and natural teeth connection, Maxillary anterior esthetics, Tooth and implant supported prosthesis

Citation Information : Venkatesan AS, Kumar V, Ilangovan K, Reddy VK, Ravindran SK. Splinting of Implants and Adjacent Natural Teeth for Esthetic Correction in Anterior Maxilla: A Case Report. 2019; 9 (2):53-56.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10083-0914

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 01-12-2019

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2019; The Author(s).


Abstract

The therapeutic goal of implant dentistry is not merely tooth placement but total oral rehabilitation. Implants provide excellent support for fixed appliances, increasing function as compared to conventional dental therapies. For long-term success of the procedure, the biomaterials, the mechanics used, and also the patient\'s cooperation for maintenance play a key role. The placement of dental implants in the anterior maxilla is a challenge for clinicians because of patients exacting demands and difficult preexisting anatomy. The esthetic restoration of anterior maxillary incisor area is critical to a successful outcome. This case report describes the placement of implant in the anterior maxillary region splinted with endodontically treated adjacent natural teeth and restoration of adjacent teeth to obtain an esthetic smile.


HTML PDF Share
  1. Albarrak AA, AlRumaih HS, Al-Humaidan A, Al-Thobity AM, Alshahrani FA. Multidisciplinary approach with predictable esthetics: a case report. Saudi Dent J 2019;31(Suppl):S89–S95. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.01.007.
  2. El Askary AE. Multifaceted aspects of implant aesthetics: the anterior maxilla. Implant Dent 2001;10(3):182–191. DOI: 10.1097/00008505-200107000-00008.
  3. Al-Omiri MK, Al-Masri M, Alhijawi MM, Lynch E. Combined implant and tooth support: an up to date comprehensive overview. Int J Dent 2017;2017:6024565. DOI: 10.1155/2017/6024565.
  4. Honsy M, Duyck J, van Steenberghe D, Naert I. Within-subject comparison between connected and non connected tooth to implant fixed partial prosthesis: up to 14 year follow up study. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13(4):340–346.
  5. Nickenig HJ, Spiekermann H, Wichmann M, Andreas SK, Eitner S. Survival and complication rates of combined tooth implant-supported fixed and removable partial dentures. Int J Prosthodont 2008;21(2):131–137.
  6. Fardal O, Linden GJ. Long term outcomes for cross arch stabilizing bridges in periodontal maintenance patients-a retrospective study. J Clin Periodontol 2010;37(3):299–304. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01528.x.
  7. Belser UC, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Taylor TD. Prosthetic management of the partially denate patient with fixed implant restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11(Suppl 1):126–145. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011S1126.x.
  8. Shenoy VK, Rodrigue SJ, Prashanthi E, Saldanha SJ. Tooth implant supported prosthesis: a literature review. J Interdiscip Dent 2013;3(3):143. DOI: 10.4103/2229-5194.131198.
  9. Laufer BZ. Splinting osseointegrated implants and natural teeth in rehabilitation of partially edentulous patients. Part II: principles and applications. J Oral Rehabil 1998;25(1):69–80. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00583.x.
  10. Salvi GE, Lang NP. Changing paradigms in implant dentistry. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2001;12(3):262–272. DOI: 10.1177/10454411010120030501.
  11. Rangert B, Gunne J, Sullivan DY. Mechanical aspects of a Branemark implant connected to a natural tooth: an in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6(2):177–186.
  12. Ericsson I, Lekholm U, Branemark PI, Lindhe J, Glantz PO, Nyman S. A clinical evaluation of fixed bridge restorations supported by the combination of teeth and osseointegrated titanium implants. J Clin Periodontal 1986;13(4):307–312. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.1986.tb02227.x.
  13. Greenstein G, Cavallaro J, Smith R, Tarnow D. Connecting teeth to implants: a critical review of the literature and presentation of practical guidelines. Compendium 2009;30(7):440–453.
  14. Newman M, Takei H, Klokkevold P. Carranza's Clinical Periodontology, 11th ed., St. Louis: Mosby; 2012. pp. 414–418.
  15. Kovacs AF. Assessment of prosthetic restorations on bone-lock implants in patients after oral tumour resection. J Oral Implantol 1998;24(2):101–109. DOI: 10.1563/1548-1336(1998)024<0101:AOPROB>2.3.CO;2.
  16. Linsen S, Niederhagen B, Braumann B, Koeck B. Functional ad esthetic rehabilitation after mandibular resection in a child using tooth/implant supported distraction device: a case report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19(4):603–608.
  17. Marcantonio E, Coleta RD, Spin-Neto R, Marcantonio Jr E, Pizzol KE, Boeck EM. Use of a tooth implant supported bone in oral rehabilitation: description of a personalized technique. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66(11):2339–2344. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2008. 06.031.
  18. Kreissl ME, Heydecke G, Metzger MC, Schoen R. Zygoma implant supported prosthetic rehabilitation after partial maxillectomy using surgical navigation: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97(3): 121–128. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.01.009.
  19. Becker CM, Kaiser DA, Jones JD. Guidelines for splinting implants. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84(2):210–214. DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2000. 108672.
  20. Brägger U, Aeschlimann S, Bürgin W, Hämmerle CH, Lang NP. Biological and technical complications and failures with fixed partial dentures (FPD) on implants and teeth after four to five years of function. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12(1):26–34. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012001026.x.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.