Journal of Scientific Dentistry

Register      Login

VOLUME 3 , ISSUE 1 ( January-December, 2013 ) > List of Articles


Evaluation of the fit of the reprocessed maxillary complete denture bases

Manoharan PS, Priyanka R, Balasubramanian R

Keywords : polymethylmethacrylate resin, complete denture, permanent denture base

Citation Information : PS M, R P, R B. Evaluation of the fit of the reprocessed maxillary complete denture bases. 2013; 3 (1):1-7.

DOI: 10.5005/jsd-3-1-1

License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Published Online: 30-07-2020

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2013; The Author(s).


Background: Reprocessing the permanent denture base after try-in is a common procedure in the complete denture fabrication. It is speculated that subjecting polymerized Poly-methyl methacrylate resin again to heat, during reprocessing can induce dimensional changes and a significant loss of intimate fit in the denture base to the tissues, can ultimately reduce the retention and stability of the complete denture. Aim and Objectives: The aim of the study is to evaluate the effect of reprocessing on the accuracy of fit of permanent poly-methyl methacrylate den-ture bases. Material and Methods: A resin edentulous maxillary model was duplicated and a total of twenty casts were poured with type III gypsum product. Group I: Permanent denture bases fabricated with heat polymerized Polymethyl-methacrylate resin. Group II: Group I permanent denture bases with wax rims reprocessed with heat polymerized Po-lymethylmethacrylate resin. Both the group were evaluated for fit using a travelling microscope. Results: Statistical analysis revealed that at each measurement period the mean posterior palatal border openings were not significantly different for processed and reprocessed denture bases. (p > 0.05). Discussion: Reprocessing permanent denture base under controlled laboratory conditions without significant dimensional change, will encourage the clinicians to use permanent record base during jaw relations and try-in. Conclusion: Maxillary permanent complete denture bases were not found to distort significantly as a result of first and second curing cycle. The central part of the posterior palatal border of the denture showed the greatest discrepancy, which was as less as 0.11 to 0.13mm. Reprocessing the perma-nent complete denture base in controlled laboratory conditions will not affect the fit and adaptation.

PDF Share
  1. Peyton FA. History of resins in dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 1975; 19(2): 211-22.
  2. Lee CJ, Bok SB, Bae JY, Lee HH. Comparative ad-aptation accuracy of acrylic denture bases evaluated by two different methods. Dental Materials Journal 2010; 29(4): 411-417.
  3. Mutlu G, Harrison A, Huggett R. A history of den-ture base materials. Quintessence Dent Tech 1989; 13: 145-50.
  4. Braden M. The absorption of water by acrylic resins and other materials. J Prosthet Dent 1964; 14: 307-16.
  5. Anusavice KJ. Phillips' Science of dental materials. 10th ed. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1996. p. 237
  6. Takamata T, Setcos JC. Resin denture bases: review of accuracy and methods of polymerization. Int J Prosthodont 1989; 2(6): 555-62.
  7. Jow J. Mechanical undercuts as a means of decreas-ing shrinkage in the post palatal seal region of the maxillary denture. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62(1): 110-5.
  8. Skinner EW. Acrylic Denture base materials: Their physical properties and manipulation. J Prosthet Dent 1951;1:161-167
  9. Reeson MG, Jepson NJ. Achieving an even thick-ness in heat-polymerized permanent acrylic resin denture bases for complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82(3): 359-61.
  10. Craig RG and Powers MJ. Restorative dental mate-rials. 11th edition, St. Louis: CV Mosby,2002.p.647-648.
  11. Yeung KC, Chow TW and Clark RK. Temperature and dimensional changes in the two stage processing technique for complete dentures. J Dent 1995; 23(4): 245-253.
  12. Antony DH and Peyton FA. Dimensional accuracy of various denture-base materials. J Prosthet Dent 1962; 12(1): 67-81.
  13. Fenlon MR, Juszczyk AS, Rodriquez JM and Curtis RV. Dimensional Stability of complete denture per-manent Acrylic Resin Denture Bases; A comparison of Dimensions before and after a Second curing cy-cle. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2010; 18(1): 33-38.
  14. Sykora O, Sutow EJ. Improved fit of maxillary complete dentures processed on high expansion stone casts. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 77(2): 205-8.
  15. Nissan J, Laufer BZ, Brosh T, Assif D. Accuracy of three polyvinyl siloxane putty wash impression tech-niques. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83(2):161-5
  16. Pow EH, Chow TW, Clark RK. Linear Dimensional change of heat cured acrylic resin complete dentures after reline and rebase. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80(2):238-45.
  17. Giglio JJ, Lace WP and Arden H. Factors affecting retention and stability of complete dentures. J. Pros-thet Dent 1962; 12: 849-56.
  18. Stewart TE, Lieutenant. Stabilised base plates. J Prosthet Dent 1955; 2: 162-168.
  19. Mirza FD. Dimensional stability of acrylic resin dentures: clinical evaluation. J Prosthet Dent 1961; 11:848-57.
  20. Becker CM, Smith DE, Nicholls JI. The comparison of denture-base processing techniques. Part 11. Di-mensional changes due to processing. J Prosthet Dent 1977; 37: 450-9.
  21. Skinner EW, Cooper EN. Physical properties of denture resins: part I. Curing shrinkage and water sorption. J Am Dent Assoc 1943; 30:1845-52.
  22. Woelfel JG, Paffenbarger GC, Sweeney WT. Changes in dentures during storage in water and in service. J Am Dent Assoc 1961; 62: 643-57.
  23. Mathews E, Wain E. Stress in denture base. Br Dent J 1956; 100: 167-171
  24. Morris JC, Khan Z, Von Fraunhofer JA. Palatal shape and the flexural strength of maxillary denture bases. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 53(5): 670-3.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.