Introduction: The most important factor for the patients coming to the dentist for rehabilitation with the prosthesis is the way they look and the way their smile is perceived. The basic requirement of any patient is the desire for “life-like” appearance of the prosthesis. One of the most significant challenges was to discover how often all the concepts of teeth selection can be practically applied in daily practice and to evaluate their application among dental practitioners.
Materials and methods: A questionnaire was circulated on the Google platform as a form of survey to determine the application of various concepts of teeth selection among dental practitioners. It was statistically evaluated on the basis of the majority of answers given. Correlation between the knowledge, attitude, and experience-based questions was determined.
Results: A statistically significant correlation was found between the knowledge-based, attitude-based, and experience-based questions. There was a linear correlation seen as a graphical representation. The way knowledge, attitude, and experience of the dental practitioners affect the treatment was also determined and correlated.
Conclusion: Esthetic rehabilitation is a wholesome process. All the factors should be given equal importance at every step from selection of the teeth to the teeth arrangement and the final results. Knowledge of all the concepts of teeth selection is important to add to the experience and attitude of the dentist. A combination of all the three values of the dental practitioner is the need of the hour to provide the superior esthetics to the patient.
Hasanreisoglu U, Berksun S, Aras K, Arslan I. An analysis of maxillary anterior teeth: Facial and dental proportions. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94(6):530–538. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.10.007.
Gomes VL, Gonclaves LC, do Prado CJ, Junior IL, de Lima Lucas B. Correlation between facial measurements and mesiodistal width of the anterior teeth. J Esthet Restor Dent 2006;18(4):196–205. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2006.00019_1.x.
Sharma A, Luthra R, Kaur P. A photographic study on visagism. Indian J Oral Sci 2015;6:122–127. DOI: 10.4103/0976-6944.171078.
Harshakumar K, Kala S, Lylajam S. A study on the facial outline form as related to the shape of the maxillary central incisor tooth at a Tertiary Dental Health Care Centre. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 2017;16(8):34–37. DOI: 10.9790/0853-1608043437.
Sudhakar N, Vishwanath A. Smile esthetics – A literature review. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 2014;13(1):32–36. DOI: 10.9790/0853-13143236.
Arora H, Hegde C, Sharma D, Bhat BS, Memon S, Mittal N. An in-vivo study to evaluate the correlation between facial form, tooth form and arch form in dentulous subjects. Int J Prevent Clin Dent Res 2016;3(2):85–91. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10052-0019.
Zakkula S, Tibra A, Budathi S. To assess the validity of Leon Williams facial forms and visagism: A photographic study. IOSR J Dent Med Sci (IOSR-JDMS) 2018;17(7):18–23. DOI: 10.9790/0853-1707131823.
Rambabu T, Gayatri C, Sajjan GS, Varma PVK, Srikanth V. Correlation between dentofacial esthetics and mental temperament: A clinical photographic analysis using visagism. Contemp Clin Dent 2018;9(1):83–87. DOI: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_788_17.
George E Kirtley. Restoring esthetics and function in an edentulous patient with ectodermal dysplasia. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2011;32(6):82–84. PMID: 21894878.
Ricketts RM. The biologic significance of the divine proportion and Fibonacci series. Am J Orthod 1982;81(5):351–370. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(82)90073-2.
Marquardt SR. Dr. Stephen R. Marquardt on the Golden Decagon and human facial beauty. Interview by Dr. Gottlieb. J Clin Orthod 2002;36(6):339–347. PMID: 12101544.
Gurel G, editor. The Science and Art of Porcelain Laminate Veneers. London: Quintessence; 2003. pp. 83–86.
Kumar MV, Ahila SC, Devi SS. The science of anterior teeth selection for a completely edentulous patient: A literature review. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2011;11(1):7–13. DOI: 10.1007/s13191-011-0058-9.
Brisman AS. Esthetics: A comparison of dentists’ and patients’ concepts. J Am Dent Assoc 1980;100(3):345–352. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.1980.0093.
Spalj S, Lajnert V, Ivankovic L. The psychosocial impact of dental aesthetics questionnaire—translation and cross-cultural validation in Croatia. Qual Life Res 2014;23(4):1267–1271. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-013-0547-x.
Diener E, Oishi S, Lucas RE. Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annu Rev Psychol 2003;54:403–425. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056.
Grant S, Langan-Fox J, Anglim J. The big five traits as predictors of subjective and psychological well-being. Psychol Rep 2009;105(1):205–231. DOI: 10.2466/PR0.105.1.205-231.
Lukez A, Pavlic A, Trinajstic Zrinski M, Spalj S. The unique contribution of elements of smile aesthetics to psychosocial well-being. J Oral Rehabil 2015;42(4):275–281. DOI: 10.1111/joor.12250.
Basavann RS, Gohil C, Shivanna V. Shade selection. Int J Oral Health Sci 2013;3(1):26–31. DOI: 10.4103/2231-6027.122097.
Bhat V, Prasad DK, Sood S, Bhat A. Role of colors in prosthodontics: Application of color science in restorative dentistry. Indian J Dent Res 2011;22(6):804–809. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9290.94675.
McLaren EA, Cao PT. Smile analysis and esthetic design: “In the Zone”. Inside Dentistry 2009;5(7).
Yılmaz B, Yuzugullu B, Cınar D, Berksun S. Effects of shade tab arrangement on the repeatability and accuracy of shade selection. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105(6):383–386. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60079-6.
Sulaiman TA. Materials in digital dentistry—a review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2020;32(2):171–181. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12566.
Jandt KD, Sigusch BW. Future perspectives of resin-based dental materials. Dent Mater 2009;25(8):1001–1006. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.02.009.